India Criticizes Pakistan for Harboring Sanctioned Terrorists. The war that started between India and Pakistan has stopped by mutual decision. However, India and many other countries have raised questions about Pakistan for harboring sanctioned terrorists. Pakistan is known to provide shelter to many dangerous criminals and terrorists. Indian media and high officials have criticized Pakistan for doing this, although Pakistan has denied any relation with the attacks or terrorists. To know more about the topic “India Criticizes Pakistan for Harboring Sanctioned Terrorists,” read the complete article.
India Criticizes Pakistan for Harboring Sanctioned Terrorists
The 2025 terrorist attack on India by Pakistani and Pakistan-trained terrorists was not the first one. Both countries have already fought 2 battles for Kashmir. But when the terrorists attacked in Pahalgam, Kashmir, and killed 26 tourists, including one local, the Indian government was forced to take serious action. Prime Minister Narendra Modi ordered a cross-border missile strike on nine sites in Pakistan. India attacked the terrorist bases of Pakistan and completely destroyed them. India has justified their strikes as they followed the UN Security Council statement on the 22nd April Pahalgam attack. Although Pakistan said that civilians were also killed in that attack.
India has criticized Pakistan for providing shelter to sanctioned terrorists and promoting terrorism secretly. There are many dangerous terrorist groups that are hiding in Pakistan to escape from other countries. These groups were carrying out their inhuman missions from Pakistan. India decided to respond to the terrorist attack in Phalgam and destroyed many terrorist and air bases. India alleges that The Resistance Front (TRF) is an offshoot of another Pakistan-based armed group, Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and has blamed Pakistan for supporting such groups.
S. Jaishankar, the minister of external affairs, emphasized the part played by Pakistan’s army and government in the nation’s terror infrastructure and issued a warning about more repercussions should terrorist attacks from across the border persist. India wants a “definitive end” to terrorism, he said. In interviews with the Dutch media during his visit to the Netherlands on May 19-20, which were published Thursday, he also ruled out third-party involvement, including by The US President Donald Trump, in the ceasefire that ended the military confrontation with Pakistan following Operation Sindhoor nearly two weeks ago.
Jaishankar made these comments in The Hague during his three-nation tour that also included Denmark and Germany. His comments follow President Trump’s repeated assertions that he is responsible for the end of hostilities, including one made Thursday morning at the White House during a meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. On Thursday, Jaishankar reached Berlin on the final leg of his tour and chaired a regional conference of Indian ambassadors stationed in Europe.
Earlier, asked by the Dutch media if he was suggesting that the Pakistani government was part of the terror infrastructure there, Jaishankar said, “I am not suggesting that; I am stating that. Suppose that there were large military centers in the middle of a city like Amsterdam, where tens of thousands of people gathered for military training, would you say that your government knows nothing about that? Of course not.”
“We should not go along with the narrative that Pakistan does not know what is going on. The most notorious terrorists on the United Nations (UN) sanctions list are all in Pakistan. They operate in the big cities, in broad daylight. Their addresses are known. Their activities are known. Their mutual contacts are known. So let’s not pretend that Pakistan is not involved. The state is involved. The army is up to its neck in it… Let’s not pretend that Pakistan is not involved.”
Asked if the ceasefire was a temporary solution and what a more sustainable solution to the conflict with Pakistan could be, he said, “we want a definitive end to terrorism. Our message is therefore: yes, the ceasefire has put an end to military actions against each other for now, but if the terrorist attacks from Pakistan continue, there will be consequences. The Pakistanis must understand that very well.”
Asked if the Kashmir dispute would be resolved first, he said, “No, for us terrorism is an independent, completely unacceptable international crime that should not be condoned or justified. The terrorists targeted the vibrant tourism industry in Jammu and Kashmir with their attack. So they are prepared to destroy things in Kashmir for their own, very limited, selfish purposes. They also deliberately gave the attack a very religious tint… The world should not accept such practices.
